This is related to this ancient ask, but it would be ideal if clojure.core/subs was type hinted with ^CharSequence rather than ^String, and used the subSequence() method instead of substring() (since the latter doesn't exist in CharSequence).
The single parameter version of subs would need to call s.length() as the second argument in the call to subSequence() (there is no single-arg version of that method, unlike substring()).
More generally, there are substantial benefits in using CharSequence instead of String throughout Clojure core, not only in the context of Java interop, but also when using custom String-like data structures (e.g. ropes).
[edit] @alexmiller mentioned this in another forum (and I'm capturing it here for posterity), but this might also require that the result be stred, to ensure the return type remains unchanged (subSequence() returns a CharSequence, unlike substring, which might break callers). There may be performance implications of adding that call for types other than String (but existing callers should be unaffected, since String.toString() is identity).
