Thanks for responding, Sean. I appreciate it.
Still, the bug with `delay` was fixed, yes? I searched around on Slack, and all the warnings I saw about `realized?` only applied to seqs: variant returns from things like `range`, what `realized?` should mean in the presence of partial realization, etc... but none of that applies to a Java Future.
Handling j.u.c.Futures wouldn't make `realized?` *more* problematic, unless encouraging its use counts.
It's not a big deal, I asked more out of surprise at the lack of input parity between `deref` and `realized?` than any burning need.