Welcome! Please see the About page for a little more info on how this works.

0 votes
in Java Interop by

Per Rich's comment in CLJ-767:

bq. Moving unchecked coercions into unchecked ns is ok

9 Answers

0 votes
by

Comment made by: ataggart

Requires that patch on CLJ-782 be applied first.

0 votes
by

Comment made by: stuart.sierra

Applies on master as of commit 66a88de9408e93cf2b0d73382e662624a54c6c86

0 votes
by

Comment made by: richhickey

still considering when to incorporate this

0 votes
by

Comment made by: jszakmeister

v2 of the patch applies to master as of commit eccde24c7fb63679f00c64b3c70c03956f0ce2c3

0 votes
by

Comment made by: jafingerhut

Patch clj-771-move-unchecked-casts-patch-v3.txt dated Sep 6 2012 is the same as Alexander Taggart's patch move-unchecked-casts.patch except that it has been updated to apply cleanly to latest Clojure master.

0 votes
by

Comment made by: jafingerhut

Patch clj-771-move-unchecked-casts-patch-v4.txt dated Oct 20 2012 is the same as Alexander Taggart's patch move-unchecked-casts.patch except that it has been updated to apply cleanly to latest Clojure master.

0 votes
by

Comment made by: jafingerhut

The patch clj-771-move-unchecked-casts-patch-v4.txt applies cleanly to latest master and passes all tests. Rich marked this ticket as Incomplete on Dec 9 2011 with the comment "still considering when to incorporate this" above. Is it reasonable to change it back to Vetted or Screened so it can be considered again, perhaps after Release 1.5 is made?

0 votes
by

Comment made by: jafingerhut

Patch clj-771-move-unchecked-casts-patch-v5.txt dated Feb 12 2013 is the same as Alexander Taggart's patch move-unchecked-casts.patch except that it has been updated to apply cleanly to latest Clojure master.

0 votes
by
Reference: https://clojure.atlassian.net/browse/CLJ-771 (reported by ataggart)
...