Clojure Q&A - Questions without answers in Syntax and reader

Syntax-quoted lists can return nil, differs from ClojureScript

Sun, 28 Jun 2026 20:43:55 +0000

Syntax quoted lists can return nil if only empty seqables are spliced into it:

Clojure 1.12.5
user=> `(~@[])
nil
user=> `(~@[] ~@[])
nil

However, the implementation then ensures syntax-quoted empty lists are not nil:

Clojure 1.12.5
user=> `()
()

ClojureScript returns an empty list in these cases:

`(~@[])
=> ()
`(~@[] ~@[])
=> ()

The expansion of syntax quote itself is not necessarily a problem if it differs between platforms, but here the evaluation of the expansion differs. This can cause macros to behave differently between platforms (e.g., JVM Clojure vs bootstrapped cljs).

This behavior seems to be present with all versions of Clojure including 1.0.0, so perhaps the ship has sailed here. I went searching for an existing issue or documentation and AFAICT only CLJ-1425 mentions this oddity.

The reference docs for Syntax Quote also seem to contradict this behavior:

For Lists/Vectors/Sets/Maps, syntax-quote establishes a template of the corresponding data structure.

Octal escape sequence decoding in strings does not stop at non-octal digit

Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:35:53 +0000

Strings suppose to support standard Java escape sequences, including octal escape sequence: [0-7]{1,3}

In Java decoding of octal sequences stop at the first non-octal digit or any other character if there are 1 or two octal digits in the escape sequence. For example:

jshell> "\18"
$1 ==> "\0018"

But Clojure reads up to 3 potentially octal digits greedily resulting in wrongly consuming non-octal digits:

Clojure 1.12.4
user=> "\18"
Syntax error reading source at (REPL:1:5).
Invalid digit: 8

non-octal characters:

Clojure 1.12.4
user=> "\1d"
Syntax error reading source at (REPL:1:5).
Invalid digit: d

And succeed only when there is line terminator or exact three octal digits in supported octal range:

Clojure 1.12.4
user=> "\1"
""
user=> "\1"
""
user=> "\12"
"\n"
user=> "\123"
"S"
user=> "\123d"
"Sd"

Associative destructuring with if-let

Sat, 07 Jun 2025 17:21:45 +0000

Hello,

I'm surprised by the result of this code :

(if-let [{errors :errors} {}]
    errors
    true) => nil

I would have expected the result to be 'true'.

As indicated by the result, 'errors' evaluates to nil, but still it's the 'then' arm of the 'if' that is evaluated.

The guide on destructuring state that "You can utilize destructuring anywhere that there is an explicit or implicit let binding.", so I'm a bit puzzled.

Please, enlighten me. Thanks !